Wednesday 28 March 2012

On RADA and Other Things


Hi there.

Do you remember me?

I’m that dude who was writing that blog about drama school auditions.

You know, the blog with the ridiculously long posts that take forever to read.

I haven’t updated it in a while.

I’m sorry.

It’s just that it’s a bit of a bore trying to find something to write about a rejection letter, when there’s not much else to look forward to in the immediate future that could provide a nice ending paragraph of hopefulness and positivity to take the edge off it…

So yes, I got a “No” from RADA through my letterbox last Friday, which, in case you didn’t get my drift before, wasn’t entirely unexpected. It was a poor audition and quite frankly I would have been considerably taken aback if I had been given another recall, because I would have had to say to myself, “Why the HELL did I get another recall from RADA after a rubbish audition, if I thought I did quite well at RWCMD and got nothing out of it?” It would have been confusing to say the least. At least now, I know that I can get a recall, if I perform well. I don’t have to worry about somehow being given recalls for bad auditions and not getting them for good ones.

In other words, my mind feels much clearer now that I can see how and why I got rejected, which is most definitely a good thing.

When I opened the letter and read what it told me, oddly enough, I felt pretty unaffected by it – almost happy. It was certainly the least disappointed I’ve ever been after a rejection, which is surprising, considering it was the furthest that I’ve ever got to in any drama school audition process. I think I just thought that if I was rejected, at least I knew that I could have done better. If I had thought I had done brilliantly and then been rejected it would have felt a million times worse than this did. As it stands, I got rejected, I know why, and I can now tell myself quite clearly, “You did well to get a recall. You could have done better. You will do better in the future. Do not be disappointed with this rejection.”

I genuinely feel good right now. I don’t see what happened at RADA happening again. My mind feels clear and focused. As far as I’m concerned, last year was a trial run and doesn’t count; this year I’ve gone from getting nothing at RWCMD, to getting through one step at RADA, and if I continue the trend then I should make the final round at Guildhall and get offers from LAMDA and Guildford…

Hmm.

But wishful thinking aside, I do really feel like I’ve turned a corner. I know I’ve done the groundwork properly. I have two good, solid speeches (three, really) that are well put-together, contrasting and definitely make an impact. The magic ingredient that I was missing at RADA was spontaneity. I don’t mean that I think I should go into my next audition and start jumping on the spot as I do my speeches. I don’t even mean that I should find new and different emotions in them than I did before. I just mean that I need to make the thoughts and emotions that I have already worked on come spontaneously. They need to feel fresh. Not different, but fresh. In real life, if you feel upset about something it doesn’t feel boring, it feels intense and new and certainly not something you can properly expect or prepare for. That concept is the same for any emotion to a large extent, and I want to bring that to my auditions. The character does not plan to say what he says, and does not prepare to feel what he feels. It just happens.

This is why I am seriously considering spending a lot less time running my monologues in the week or so before the auditions. In fact I doubt whether I’ll run them much at all in that time, unless there’s something specific I need to sort out. It’s just that I know they are good and I want them to feel fresh. Not under-prepared, not particularly different, but fresh.

And that brings me on to the topic of when exactly I’m going to be putting this plan into action. Because the drama schools are so well-co-ordinated with one another and they work together to make things easier and less stressful for people, Guildhall and LAMDA have decided to put their two audition days literally right next to one another. Guildhall is on the 10th April, LAMDA on the 11th

So that’s just brilliant. Oh well, at least I’ll have something to distract me if Guildhall give me a “no”…

But anyway, there’s a little while to go before my next encounter with a member of the Holy 21 schools. Until then, I have a theatre company to help set up, and a course with the National Youth Film Academy to be getting on with.

Not bad, eh? In fact, I’ve got a pretty good month ahead of me I think.

Though I’d swap everything for a place somewhere…

Wednesday 14 March 2012

Drama School 2012 Mission Log - Entry 3: RADA Recall


RADA Recall: If nothing else, at least I’ll come out of all this in the knowledge that I did do at least a little bit better than last year.

Quite how much better I’m going to have done, though, remains to be seen, because after today I’m not entirely sure what to think.

After my initial excitement about the fact that I got a recall (for a change) wore off somewhat, I was left with a determination not to be a) cocky, b) too relaxed, or c) anxious to “up my game” in some way from what clearly worked the first time round, even though this was a recall. And I think (based on my reflections before I actually know the result) I succeeded, to an extent.

But I do think the key phrase there is “to an extent”.

I mean, I wasn’t cocky, I know that for a fact. I was pretty nervous about the whole thing and certainly wouldn’t describe myself as “relaxed”, so there was no chance of me going in there and thinking I could blag my way through it. And I had been telling myself constantly that there was no need to feel that I should try and do something drastically different from what I did before, because this second round is basically just another, slightly glorified, first round, to see if the original panel’s initial impressions were accurate or if it was a one-off. Seeing as I was pretty certain it wasn’t a one-off, because I had prepared thoroughly for my speeches, I said to myself that I should just go in and do what I did before, albeit with extra focus and attention to make sure I did it right (the Principal of RADA was on the panel, after all…).

“What could possibly go wrong?” I hear you cry. Actually, I don’t hear you, I’m sitting here on my own, at 11.10pm in my living room, and if a disembodied voice suddenly started speaking to me out of nowhere right now I’d probably shit my pants.

But anyway, working on the assumption that I asked myself that question, the answer is, “I’m not entirely sure”. It’s very hard to describe what I felt today. I woke up nice and early, I did everything by the book, got my preparation pretty much spot on, got there in plenty of time, read over my notes, etc. etc. But somehow, something just wasn’t quite right today. It wasn’t far off, but even from the moment I woke up, it just wasn’t quite there. Maybe it was because it was my first recall audition and it was having some sort of subconscious effect on me – like how a footballer sometimes plays worse when he gets called up for England for the first time than he does when he plays for his club, week in, week out, even though he just has to do the same thing that he does normally. Or maybe I’m just looking for an excuse to compare myself to a footballer, I don’t know…

I was the only person there when I arrived, but the girl who I mentioned in my post about the first RADA audition arrived a little while after me (didn’t I say I knew she’d get a recall?), which was nice, because it was good to have a friendly face there. But, annoyingly, while we were waiting to be called in, she recognised somebody who was walking through the entrance hall who she presumably hadn’t seen for quite some time, and proceeded to have a massive hug and “Hello!!” with them, which just served to remind me that I don’t know anybody at any drama school at all and that she, unlike me, had already been offered a place at a top drama school this year…

So that certainly didn’t help with psychologically preparing myself.

Anyway. I’m really struggling to find a way to describe how it felt, and this might not do the trick, but please bear with me – I’ll give it a go. Today, it felt like I was a lawnmower (bear with me, I said…); one of those power mowers that you have to pull the cord on to get it to start. It’s a pretty expensive mower, and it’s built well – all the parts work nicely, they’ve all been designed with fancy Mac laptops and oiled with WD40 Extra Smooth Glide or something – all in all, it’s a pretty handy machine, and naturally you’d expect it to do a good job of cutting your lawn. Now normally, when you want to start mowing, you pull the cord and the motor fires up. All the parts work perfectly and all the power inside the motor is delivered to all the correct components and it all works nicely and seamlessly, as it’s been designed to do. And you mow your lawn. Now imagine that one day you get your lawnmower, which is still really new-looking, with parts that mesh together really nicely and smoothly and which still work just as brilliantly as how they did when they were first designed and manufactured, and you try to mow your lawn with it. And you pull the cord, and the mechanism spins around inside, like it normally does when you pull the cord, but the motor just doesn’t kick in, for some reason. The cord pulls out fine, and the actual blades at the bottom of the lawnmower briefly turn as they usually do when you pull out the cord, but only for a second, because the engine just doesn’t want to start. Theoretically, you can still mow your lawn without the motor starting, because you have the power to turn the blades at what is still a pretty high speed by just quickly pulling the cord over and over again, and so that’s exactly what you do; you push the mower along your lawn while repeatedly pulling the cord to turn the blades at the bottom. And your grass does get cut.

But it’s not as easy as when the motor does it for you, and you can’t quite turn the blades at the same speed as the motor can, nor do so with the same level of consistency as with the motor. And you get to the end of your lawn and stop, and look back at what you’ve done, and you see that the grass has definitely been cut, and it doesn’t look too bad, but you’re sweating a lot, and your arm aches, and if you look closely there are little patches where the lawn hasn’t been cut as evenly as it would have been with the motor working, and it’s taken you a bit longer than it would have done normally, and just overall, despite your best efforts (and you haven’t done a bad job, considering you have no engine) it still just doesn’t look quite right.

That’s how I felt today. I’d put all the work in, I’d designed the framework and the mechanisms for doing well by practising my speeches and working them with the lovely lady I do them with and I felt confident that if I did them well it wouldn’t be a fluke, it would be down to my hard work. I wasn’t stabbing in the dark, I was following clearly laid tracks that I knew would lead me in the right direction, because I put a lot of effort into designing and working on them. In other words, I just needed some impetus, some kind of drive inside to utilise that framework as effectively as I could possibly utilise it. But for some reason, and maybe I’ll never know why, when I woke up today I just couldn’t feel it inside me. I know that sounds stupid but it’s the truth. I did everything I could to get it working: I ate a good breakfast, did a lot of walking and running around and hopping on the spot, I read over my notes and really tried to think about my characters and shouted stuff at myself in my head, but somehow it just wasn’t happening. It was like the real me was hiding inside, desperately trying to pump some kind of drive into me. I could feel him oiling the cogs and wheels inside me, putting all his effort into trying to get myself ready, and then when doing the speeches, pulling and pulling on the cord to get the gears turning as fast as he could, but it just didn’t quite catch in the same way as I know it can do when the motor really gets going by itself. He did his absolute best, and probably ended up creating a pretty passable imitation of what I can do when I’m working completely properly, but to me, a fairly seasoned examiner of my own ability, I know I can do a lot, lot better.

And that does suck, because this was a really big chance for me.

But I am not beating myself up about it too much. Why? Because I know there was nothing more I could have done. As I said before, I tried everything. I have experienced that feeling before when acting, admittedly not in quite such an important situation, and I know there’s often very little you can do to change it. I’m sure it happens to lots of people fairly regularly, and it just ended up happening to me today. If I had just accepted it and let myself be rubbish then I would be seriously kicking myself because I wouldn’t have been trying. But I was trying – I tried as hard as I could to get it going, and I think I made the best of a bad situation. The little version of me deep inside pulling on the cords and turning the gears did the best job he could have done with the limited resources available to him. He did have an excellent lawnmower available to him and he did a decent job of mowing the lawn with it, even if the power to really make good use of that mower tended to come in slightly frustrating fits and bursts as opposed to in a nice, constant stream. And I know for certain that I’m not making all this up as an excuse because barely an hour after I got out of there, I felt completely normal again! All day since then I have felt the same as how I felt yesterday. I have felt normal. And it was through no conscious effort of mine that I got back to feeling normal again – it just happened. There was nothing else I could have done to make it happen any sooner, and as such I can’t give myself stick about it not quite happening in the audition room. I did the best I could.

Thankfully, though, the audition wasn’t just two pieces. There was an interview as well, and a song, and to start with the former, I felt like I did give a pretty good account of myself when I sat down to chat to them. This being a recall audition, and there being two extra panellists compared to last time, there were more questions for me to answer than before, so it’s just as well I spent so long preparing for the interview. Lots of smiling, lots of eye contact (not weirdly so, I hope…) and LOTS of positivity and enthusiasm about everything. I have trained myself to do this now, and as it’s what I did in the first round, it must have worked to an extent, seeing as I found myself sitting there in a recall audition today. I talked about the play I’d seen recently (the same as I did in the first round, but in slightly more detail this time), I talked about what I was up to at the moment and what my plans were, I talked about what my other interests were (football, French and biology, apparently) and I talked about my speeches. I think I picked up on a slightly cheeky “catch-him-out”-style question when I was asked if I had read the plays and where I found my modern monologue (“in an audition book?”). NO! NEVER AN AUDITION BOOK!!! If there’s one thing I’ve learnt, it’s that you never say you found it in an audition book. Now, I won’t lie, it was from an audition book (which is maybe why they asked, because it’s probably quite a commonly used speech), but that wasn’t for lack of trying to find one in a play somewhere. It’s damn difficult to find a good speech; I’ve spent hours and hours trawling through plays at French’s and the National Theatre Bookshop and I certainly wouldn’t have gone with this one if I didn’t feel like it was absolutely perfect for me, which it definitely is. But no, I told them I read the play first, which was fine anyway because I knew I could answer questions on the play because since finding the speech I have read the play a couple of times over and know it quite well.

But anyway. Overall the interview went very well. I reflected afterwards that I probably wouldn’t have traded my good interview for doing my monologues better, because I felt like I did make a fairly good impression, which I think is important (of course it would have been great to have good monologues and a good interview, but oh well…). As I say, I was pretty happy with this aspect of the audition.

And then, finally, the song. Now, I don’t like singing all that much. I’m not bad I guess, but I’m definitely not great. Thankfully my song is a fun song to do and I enjoy doing it, but again the numbness I felt earlier with the speeches came back to me with the song. I just didn’t quite give it everything that I know I can give it. But I didn’t fluff any notes and I think I got the ending pretty much right, which is important, and it wasn’t bad overall, I guess. But, rather like the speeches, just not incredible.

I left the room and sort of slumped against a wall for a moment. I felt physically drained. I genuinely did feel like there had been somebody inside me working their arse off to try and make things happen, and by the time it was over I had been left pretty exhausted somehow. The nice girl asked me how it went and I said it was ok (which was about the best reply I could muster) but that I really wasn’t sure, which was true. She had mentioned earlier that she thought her first round audition hadn’t been great and that she was really surprised when she got a recall, and reminded me now of that, and that I shouldn’t think about it too much because sometimes you think you’ve done well and you haven’t, and vice-versa. Of course, her version (her, now officially soon-to-be-Acting-Student-of-Drama-Centre version) of “not doing that great” is probably my equivalent of acting my heart out, but oh well.

I can’t say for certain whether I did or didn’t get another recall. It wasn’t clear cut to me, which I think is a good thing, at least. There’s a possibility there that it went a bit better than I thought. One thing that’s true for these auditions is that you never know for sure, I guess. But my performances just could have been a bit more effective than they ended up being, that’s all.

Anyway, that was that: my first recall, gone forever. It’s a two-week wait now before I find out if I got through to the third round, but as far as I’m concerned, my next audition is for Guildhall on the 10th April, followed swiftly by LAMDA on the 11th. RADA is history now – I think it’s best to think of it that way for the time being.

But I’ll look back on today and know that I tried my hardest. It might not have come off 100% but there was nothing more, on the day, that I could have done.

I think I should just be happy that I got a recall, really. It was a nice feeling.

Wednesday 7 March 2012

A REAL update about RADA


It appears the gods have answered my cries (maybe they read this blog?)

After many long days of waiting, my reply from RADA regarding my first round audition came in the post today. The same envelope that I had sent off to them with my application, now containing one solitary, thin letter (don’t people say that if the envelope is thick then it’s a recall, if it’s thin it’s a rejection?…) was perched upon my doormat.

Bizarrely, despite the fact that I had to attach a stamp to the envelope they still felt the need to mark it with their own franking machine anyway. I could have saved myself 36p…

Funnily enough, though, that wasn’t what was occupying the majority of my attention as I looked at the letter. Frustratingly, this was the one day of the week that my Mum wasn’t at work in the morning and as such it was her that found the letter first on the doormat and gave it to me – I could feel her metaphorically peering over my shoulder as I opened it, which was annoying, but at least physically speaking I had shut myself in the kitchen so nobody could sneak up behind me and see. It’s a pretty personal thing and I hate the feeling of having to share it with people without having a chance for the result, whatever it may be, to sink in first.

I stalled for time by firstly opening another letter that was sent to me (I receive nothing in the post for weeks, and then two things come at once??), before, finally, I could put it off no longer. All manner of things were running through my head. I have managed, over the past few days, to distinguish RADA from the other drama schools in my mind (mainly as a way to stop myself thinking about the result so much) and have been telling myself that RADA “doesn’t count” as one of the drama schools that I am auditioning for and that to receive a rejection from them shouldn’t affect the rest of my applications or the way that I think about them, i.e. because RADA is so much higher in terms of numbers of applicants it should be treated as an entirely separate venture to the rest of them, and that I should try and focus on the other schools for the time being, if you get my drift. I told myself that LAMDA was where I was going to focus on and that it shouldn’t affect my LAMDA application or the way I thought about it or prepared for it if I was rejected by RADA…

But none of that really helped.

Anyway, I opened the letter…





















I GOT A RECALL!!!


At the eighth time of asking, I finally got a recall somewhere! And at RADA too! I’m not completely useless! Woohoo!!!

Anyway, I mustn’t get too excited, for two main reasons: 1) even if I get TWO MORE recalls from RADA I’d still have to pass the final round, so there’s a LONG way to go, and 2) I’ve got to get preparing, because my recall is exactly one week away today!

So as I say, I’d better get practising – especially as they ask for a song this time…

Now THAT’S gonna be interesting…

Tuesday 6 March 2012

An update about my RADA audition


And the news is...

(Drum roll please) 

...

There is no news. I still haven’t received their answer! Gah. I hate waiting. Of course I’d prefer to wait for a month and hear good news than wait for a week and get bad news, but still…

In the letter that RADA sent to me, they said, “You will be informed by letter within a week of your audition result.”

There are seven days in a week. There are 24 hours in a day. There are therefore 168 hours in a week. I auditioned at approximately 10.30am on Monday 27th February 2012. It is currently 2.34pm on Tuesday 6th March 2012. The amount of time that has elapsed between the time of my audition and now is 196 hours and 4 minutes. Now if I am correct (and please do feel free to explain thoroughly to me how and why I may be incorrect), this means that it has now been 28 hours and 4 minutes more than a week since I auditioned.

They lied!

What could this mean? Was my audition so good that they haven’t bothered to send me a letter because they’ve accepted me onto their course straightaway and are just legally obliged to audition other people before they tell me officially because everybody’s paid £55, and once that’s all over and done with I’ll be given a phone call and offered a place? Or did my audition appal them so much that they feel that wasting a rejection letter on somebody who auditioned as badly as me would be doing the tree that provided the paper a major disservice? Or maybe it’s because when I gave them stamped addressed envelopes to use to send me the results of my audition, I attached 2nd Class stamps as opposed to 1st

Yes, I regret that now.

But hey, they never mentioned anything in their letter about results taking longer than a week to be delivered if they were coming in envelopes with 2nd Class stamps on them! They shouldn’t make promises like that unless they can back them up! I can’t be the only one to attach 2nd Class stamps… I mean when you’re paying £55 for an audition it’s only natural to try and save money where you can. I mean, the envelope I sent to them wasn’t actually even an envelope – it was just a piece of A4 paper folded and glued together to look like an envelope.

Ok no it wasn’t, but still, a sentence that went a bit more like this might have been more appropriate: “You will be informed of your audition result by letter, which we shall post within a week of your audition but which may take longer than a week to reach you, depending on the type of stamp you attached to the envelope.” It’s a slightly more unwieldy sentence than the one they used, but certainly a more accurate one.

Anyway I just thought I’d write this because a) I’m bored, and b) I know you’re all desperate for more posts from me… The trouble is that now I’ve written about every audition I’ve done (and also written about UCAS, and just written this desperate excuse for a post today) I’m struggling for drama school material. Depending on how things pan out I might end up writing about other acting-y things as well (mainly to stave off my own boredom) but we shall see…

Until next time, I leave you with this thought:

“A man who dares to waste one hour of his life has…”

No, that’s not right…

Umm… Maybe this:

“Life has meaning only if…”

If…

If…




Ah, forget it, I got nothing.

Friday 2 March 2012

"A reasonable argument against the current UCAS system with regards to drama school applications.”


This is not an account of one of my auditions. I repeat: this is NOT another account of an audition (I can virtually hear the sighs of relief from all around). This is me having what some people might call “a rant”, but what I prefer to call “a reasonable argument against the current UCAS system with regards to drama school applications”.

Allow me to explain: if you are a regular reader (I’m talking to both of you, here) then you will know that I really enjoyed my audition at Central last year, and may be wondering now why I am not applying there again this time around – a very reasonable question, and one with a slightly complicated and incredibly frustrating answer.

As you will know if you have applied there before, Central (as well as Drama Centre and Rose Bruford, among others) use the UCAS system for their applications. The idea of using UCAS is to simplify the process of applying for higher education by bringing all the various course options around the country together in one system, rather than all institutions having to operate entirely independently of one another, which would make things rather complicated for people applying to several different places at once.

Sounds fair enough, right? Well, I’m afraid that’s not quite how I see it…

The trouble with UCAS, when thought of in terms of drama school applicants, is that it only allows you to apply for five courses per year. As most people using UCAS will be applying for universities as well as drama schools, when you think about it this can severely limit your options. Even when only applying to two drama schools on UCAS, as I did last year, that only leaves three universities for you to apply to at the same time, and as university applicants will know, the more options you have, the better. For instance, last year, I only gained a place at one of the three universities that I was able to apply to, and I could easily have got into none at all. If I hadn’t got into any then I could have been forced to take a gap year that I didn’t want to take, a situation that could potentially have been avoided by being able to apply to the full complement of five universities, at the same time as applying to drama schools (which I think would be fair, given how unlikely the chances of gaining a drama school place are). Now, as I had planned from the start to take a gap year if I didn’t get in to drama school the first time round, this was not actually a problem for me, as I had applied to all the universities with a view to deferring my place there for a year anyway, to take if I didn’t get into a drama school at the second time of asking. But many people might not have been in my position and could have just wanted to apply once to drama school – these people could have potentially been left with no other option but to take a gap year if they didn’t get a place at a drama school or any of their three universities.

So now you’re thinking, “I don’t know why he’s so grumpy – he’s just written a 317-word paragraph about how UCAS does screw some people over, but how he ISN’T one of those people!” Oh, but I wish it were that simple…

I have my university place, which I am willing to take in the event that I don’t get into drama school this year. Unfortunately, because of the UCAS system, I can’t keep that place in reserve and start a new UCAS application at the same time. If I want to keep my deferred place at university as a backup, I am not allowed to use UCAS again to apply to Central, or Drama Centre, or Rose Bruford, or any other drama school on UCAS. This is why the only schools I have been able to apply to this time around have been ones that do not use the UCAS system. Considering how hard it is to gain a place at any drama school, I think that having your options limited like this is really unfair.

In my opinion, all the drama schools should be following RWCMD’s example. They use the new “CUKAS” system, which is an affiliate of UCAS that specialises in performing arts courses. This would provide all the positives of the UCAS system, such as a streamlined application process that makes things simpler for people, but, as it is a separate entity to UCAS itself, would prevent the stupid problem that I have from happening to people. Because the universities would be on one system and the drama schools on the other, there wouldn’t be any conflicts between the two and people like me would be able to apply to all the schools that they wanted to, with university as a separate, viable option in the likely event that applying to drama school doesn’t work out.

They should really put me in charge, shouldn’t they?...